🔗 Share this article

It has been described as one of the largest scams of its kind in the Britain.

A total of 14 people have been convicted for their part in a multi-million pound conspiracy to swindle over 3,500 timeshare investors.

The affected individuals were eager to get out of age-old timeshare contracts and went looking for help.

A large number were in the age range of 60 and 80. Over 500 of them parted with over £10,000, and one transferred more than £80,000.

Those victimized were exposed to high-pressure consultations continuing for six hours. They were left out of pocket, owning worthless fake "credits" and still bound by high-priced vacation property deals they frequently were unable to use.

The Business Behind the Fraud

The company at the centre of the scheme was Sell My Timeshare (SMT). They took customers' funds to finance the owners' opulent way of life of exclusive education, luxury homes and personal aircraft.

The individual at the head of the organization, the main defendant, was sentenced to a seven and a half year prison term in January for fraudulent conspiracy.

Recently, his wife one of the co-defendants was part of the concluding cases to receive sentencing.

She received a 24-month suspended jail sentence at the judicial venue after admitting money laundering.

It has been a lengthy process and represents a major victory for the people who spoke out, the law enforcement and legal representatives.

How the Inquiry Was Initiated

I first heard about the company came in the mid-2016. The position was in the reporting team of a media outlet, creating current affairs features.

A acquaintance mentioned that his parent had taken over the use of a timeshare apartment in Spain and, after years of holidays, had started seeking to get out of the deal.

It's worth mentioning how popular holiday ownership had evolved with British holidaymakers in the eighties and nineties.

Timeshares permitted families to occupy the identical property each season, or trade their time slots with fellow investors who had properties in other resorts. Roughly 600,000 vacation seekers accepted that option.

The first timeshare rush was linked to a lot of stories about dishonest operators deceptively promoting units. They appeared frequently on consumer TV programmes.

The typical holiday ownership agreement bound owners for long periods.

In that period, those owners who had enjoyed their assigned property in the sun for 20 or 30 years were ageing, and a large proportion were hoping to wave goodbye to their timeshares.

A number had reduced ability to travel and couldn't get to their units. A few just felt they'd got all they wanted from them. And others had died, in numerous instances bequeathing their heirs to inherit the agreements - plus their regular contributions and service charges.

The Covert Probe Develops

This was the situation the family member had found herself. She browsed the internet for options and found SMT, a enterprise whose website assured to terminate her agreement.

Yet, having submitted funds and scheduled a consultation with them, her family became suspicious.

Additional investigation showed many victims saying they had paid money and received no benefit in return. Actually, they had suffered financially. Substantial amounts.

The reporting group commenced probing what was going on. It quickly became clear that there were some shady characters working within the holiday ownership market.

One lawyer had many grievance cases aiming to litigate against SMT.

The team interviewed individuals who had used the firm and they each reported similar experiences. They believed the business would acquire their investment from them but when they participated in a session (for which they made an advance payment) they were told there was no potential buyers.

Rather, they were pushed - indeed coerced - to commit further cash investing in "the company's points system", associated with the organization's holding firm, the overarching entity.

The nature of these rewards was not exactly clear. They appeared to be a form of credit, giving access to discount travel and amenities and retail offers.

And they were apparently "exchangeable with fellow investors, some time down the line.

Paying cash at the time would produce an eventual payoff that would offset SMT's fees and result in the timeshare holder ahead financially, liberated eventually from their troublesome contract.

An unbelievable offer? Indeed, it was.

A 'Deceptive Tactic'

Assuming these reports were true, this was a major deception.

This is known as a "bait-and-switch."

A business - specifically the company - "attracts the client by advertising a particular product only to then state it cannot be provided, directing the individual to another, inferior product or service.

This is against the law. Possessing all the accounts we had assembled, we made the case to secretly film one of the company's meetings.

This takes commitment, energy, and clear arguments for why this is the sole method to gather the evidence needed to confirm deceptive practices.

Once authorized, our small team set up a meeting with one of the company's representatives in Stratford-Upon-Avon.

Acting as a potential client hoping to help his mother out of her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement